[Beowulf] Computation on the head node
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSun May 18 10:37:06 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Next message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vlad Manea wrote: > Thanks Perry, > > I would probably go with a separate file server. > I have seen a lot of NAS on the market recently (i.e. Netgear ReadyNAS > NV+ 4Tb X-RAID) > and I am wandering if they might be a good/bad choice (the price is > appealing...). You get what you pay for ... c.f. http://reviews.cnet.com/external-hard-drives/netgear-readynas-nv-network/4505-3190_7-32578766.html > On the other hand I do not want to see all may cluster idle waiting for > the file server. > The w/r rate transfer for these NAS is ~30-40 MB/sec which probably is a > modest one. Its all about the design and implementation. These units are rate limited internally to about 80 MB/s (speed of a single drive). Now share that among 10-20 nodes. We approach it from a different view. Start out with a very fast RAID and attach good networking to it. Here is a RAID6 across 12 disks. This is writing an 84 GB file root at crunch:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/big/local.file bs=8M count=10000 oflag=direct 10000+0 records in 10000+0 records out 83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied, 124.942 s, 671 MB/s This is reading an 84 GB file root at crunch:~# dd if=/big/local.file of=/dev/null bs=8M count=10000 iflag=direct 10000+0 records in 10000+0 records out 83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied, 123.236 s, 681 MB/s Coupling the network to the RAID so that you can expose most of the performance out the net is an issue that the ReadyNAS doesn't seem to have addressed. They are more focused upon bulk storage for small sites. > Do you have any recommendations for the file server? I think I need lots > of RAM and fast > disks. Since SCSI are expensive, are SATA disks OK? Also, can I take the > advantage of multiple > LAN ports on the file server? (I see the Dell PowerEdge SC1435 can > handle 4 NICs for example.) One of our customers has a unit with 10 NICs in it they are using to feed several clusters, and an office. Another has IB and 6 NICs for a similar arrangement. Others have 10 GbE cards. If your cluster network can handle the heavy networking, I/O is often a rate limiting system for performance, so try to get as much network bandwidth in and out as you can. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Next message: [Beowulf] Computation on the head node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
