[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Karen Shaeffer shaeffer at neuralscape.comMon May 12 10:56:25 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:20:21AM -0500, Geoff Jacobs wrote: > > It's a separate feed from the ATX supply, and I can't see how anyone > would be stupid enough to switch it on the motherboard. It should be > simply railed around the motherboard wherever needed. Perhaps, just to > be sure, I should break out my dead MVP3 board and the DMM -- have a > little experiment. Hi Geoff, Stupid? More likely attempting to minimize the BOM of the board, if that is the case. Stupid? I mean folks have been talking about the shared NIC on some Dell system boards in this thread. That is a clear example where all the circuitry on the system board is not isolated. Exactly my point. You don't need to go into the lab, if you just remembered what was said in this thread, you have a clear example. Thanks, Karen -- Karen Shaeffer Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306 shaeffer at neuralscape.com http://www.neuralscape.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
