[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comMon May 12 06:20:21 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karen Shaeffer wrote: > Hi Geoff, > Following my line of thought, the issue is only whether the PCI rail(s) > powering all the IPMI circuitry are completely isolated from the > rest of the system board circuitry or not. If true, then it would > be equivalent to a daughterboard implementation. If false, then it > would not. > > Thanks for your comments, > Karen It's a separate feed from the ATX supply, and I can't see how anyone would be stupid enough to switch it on the motherboard. It should be simply railed around the motherboard wherever needed. Perhaps, just to be sure, I should break out my dead MVP3 board and the DMM -- have a little experiment. -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
