[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comSun May 11 23:56:39 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 19:13 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > O > Last I saw someone doing this, IPMI sharing an ethernet port with the > host led to all kinds of weird ARP problems. Whereas a dedicated port > is much easier to configure. My favorite vendors all offer a > dedicated port... Also port number clashes between 'rsh' type protocols and the IPMI ports, in older kernels. The minuum port for Sun-rpc is now set to 665 :#define RPC_DEF_MIN_RESVPORT (665U) IPMI uses 623/664
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list