[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caSat May 10 23:45:05 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> I find that with IPMI and console redirection, it's very rarely necessary to >> care about where your nodes are, at least from a sysadmin perspective. > > Speaking of IPMI, are there reasonable motherboards that incorporate > it right into the design at this point, or is it still mostly an add > on? bit of both - supermicro and tyan both rely on add-in cards, but HP (and probably some other vendors) have integrated IPMI onboard. I keep reading stuff from Intel and AMD about managability which sounds tantalizingly like IPMI-like managability being integrated into the chipset. I think the main issue is that ipmi needs a lan interface, though I guess there are some examples of it sharing a port with the host.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
