[Beowulf] Do these SGE features exist in Torque?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Reuti reuti at staff.uni-marburg.deFri May 9 13:17:03 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Do these SGE features exist in Torque?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Do these SGE features exist in Torque?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Am 09.05.2008 um 20:26 schrieb Prentice Bisbal: > At a previous job, I installed SGE for our cluster. At my current job > Torque is the queuing system of choice. I'm very familar with SGE, but > only have a cursory knowledge of Torque (installed it for evaluation, > and that's it). We're about to purchase a new cluster. I'd have to > make > a good argument for using SGE over Torque. I was wondering if the > following SGE features exist in Torque: > > 1. Interactive shells managed by queuing system > 2. Counting licenses in use (done using a contributed shell script > in SGE) > 3. Separation of roles between submit hosts, execution hosts, and > administration hosts > 4. Certificate-based security. > > Are there any notable features available in Torque that aren't > available > in SGE? what you can find in Torque but not in SGE: request a mixture of nodes, i.e. one heavy node with much memory (or big I/O options) and 5 nodes with less memory or less disk performance for a parallel job. OTOH, if you have parallel jobs: http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2007- September/019269.html What is different between them from the idea: in Torque you submit a job into a queue, while in SGE you request resources and SGE will select an appropriate queue for you. -- Reuti
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Do these SGE features exist in Torque?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Do these SGE features exist in Torque?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
