[Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu May 8 14:04:01 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Here are some measurements I just made on OpenMP STREAM: > 8-thread > STREAM Copy (GB/s) > Harpertown - ---------------- > Xeon 5410, 2.33 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB: 6.2 > Xeon 5472, 3.0 GHz, 1600 MHz FSB: 7.3 > Barcelona - > Opteron 2352, 2.1 GHz: 15.7 > (the 3 other STREAM components were pretty similar to Copy) very nice. it would be good to know the memory configuration. of course, the real question is how well Nehalem will do - does anyone have numbers? it's a sticky time for specifying clusters, since current Intel chips have great onchip performance but are dramatically constrained in decent-sized HPC apps. choosing AMD, while defensible based on current memory performance, looks extremely iffy otherwise. (the most recent AMD disclosures have them attempting to milk the k10 core for the next couple years (!).)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Recent comparisons of 1600 MHz external Harpertown vs.235x AMD processors?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
