[Beowulf] Distributed FS (Was: copying big files)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Aug 14 07:17:41 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Distributed FS (Was: copying big files)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Distributed FS (Was: copying big files)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Extending your storage that way is just darn cheap. in fact, we really have to stop thinking of storage as a significant cost component to clusters. if adding a terabyte disk to a node increases its cost by ~2%, then it's in the noise. > Take a look at PVFS (www.pvfs.org). Disclaimer: I work on PVFS, but > seriously, PVFS has been used this way for a decade. the premise of this approach is that whoever is using the node doesn't mind the overhead of external accesses. do you have a sense (or even measurements) on how bad this loss is (cpu, cache, memory, interconnect overheads)? if you follow the reasoning that current machines are pretty 'fat' wrt IB bandwidth and cpu power, there's still a question of who does the work of raid/fec - ideally, it would be on the client side to minimize the imposed jitter. thanks, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Distributed FS (Was: copying big files)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Distributed FS (Was: copying big files)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
