[Beowulf] Kerberos + HPC
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comTue Aug 5 09:59:30 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Kerberos + HPC
- Next message: [Beowulf] Kerberos + HPC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Prentice Bisbal <prentice at ias.edu> writes: > John Hearns wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 15:37 +1000, Chris Samuel wrote: >> >>> We'd prefer to steer clear of Kerberos, it introduces >>> arbitrary job limitations through ticket lives that >>> are not tolerable for HPC work. >> >> Kerberos is heavily used at CERN. They have a solution for that issue - >> the job can ask for an extension to the tickets. >> Sorry, I don't have a reference handy but its worth documenting this for >> the list. > > If ANYONE has more information on how this is done at CERN, I'd be very > interested in hearing about it. I know, I know... GIYF... I doubt they're dong anything unusual -- this is a completely normal thing any Kerberos setup deals with. You just stash the private key on the server, request a long ticket lifetime and refresh reasonably tickets frequently. Standard documentation can tell you how to do it -- just read the manuals. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Kerberos + HPC
- Next message: [Beowulf] Kerberos + HPC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
