[Beowulf] IB DDR: mvapich2 vs mvapich performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric Thibodeau kyron at neuralbs.comWed Apr 23 13:48:04 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IB DDR: mvapich2 vs mvapich performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] IB DDR: mvapich2 vs mvapich performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote: > In message from Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> (Wed, 23 Apr 2008 > 00:36:44 -0700): >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:04:51AM +0400, Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote: >> >>> Is this throughput difference the result of MPI-2 vs MPI >>> implementation or should I beleive that this difference (about 4% >>> for my mvapich vs mvapich2 at SC'07 ) is not significant - in the >>> sense that it is simple because of some measurement errors >>> (inaccuracies)? >> >> I dunno, does it help your real applications? > > Significantly - of course, not :-) But our application is really > bounded by throughput ! Throughput or latency? > > Yours > Mikhail >> >> -- greg >> Eric
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IB DDR: mvapich2 vs mvapich performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] IB DDR: mvapich2 vs mvapich performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
