[Beowulf] MPICH vs. OpenMPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netWed Apr 23 11:37:06 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPICH vs. OpenMPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] MPICH vs. OpenMPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Mark, Mittwoch, 23. April 2008, meintest Du: >> Can anyone give me a quick comparison of OpenMPI vs. MPICH? I've always >> used MPICH (I never liked lam), and just recently heard about OpenMPI. >> Anyone here using it? MH> openmpi is a genetic descendent of lam (with significant other contributors, MH> of course). I have not seen any good comparison which makes technical or MH> performance arguments in favor of open-mpi vs mpich, unfortunately. From what i saw OpenMPI has several advantages: - better control of jobs, better integration with queuing systems - better performance on MultiCore Systems because of good shared-memory-implementation - without having a real proof: i had the feeling that complex operations are more efficient in OpenMPI - support for a lot of Interconnects beside TCP/IP based communication I don't see a real point chosing mpich over OpenMPI. Cheers, Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080423/40b39569/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPICH vs. OpenMPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] MPICH vs. OpenMPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
