[Beowulf] OpenMP vs. MPI benchmark for multi-core machines?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Charlie Peck charliep at cs.earlham.eduThu Apr 17 10:42:48 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OpenMP vs. MPI benchmark for multi-core machines?
- Next message: [Beowulf] OpenMP vs. MPI benchmark for multi-core machines?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Eray Ozkural wrote: > Is there such a benchmark that I can refer to? I am increasingly > convinced that OpenMP/pthread is required only in extreme cases, but I > need some numbers to prove that (to myself and my advisor). Like most other cases YMMV, significantly. That is there is no way to say that one is better than the other except for a very particular situation. This is exacerbated by the fact that different MPI implementations handle communication between processes on the same CPU differently, and some vary further by the choices made during ./ configure. charlie
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OpenMP vs. MPI benchmark for multi-core machines?
- Next message: [Beowulf] OpenMP vs. MPI benchmark for multi-core machines?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
