[Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Guilherme Menegon Arantes garantes at iq.usp.brThu Sep 27 14:19:31 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Advantage to compiling RHEL 5 with opteron option?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sep 27, 2007 at 12:01:32PM -0700, richard.walsh at comcast.net wrote: > > Gaussian and GAMESS algs. typically do not store integrals unless they fit into memory. It has been more efficient to just recompute them than to store them. For some reason my previous email did not make it through the list yet, but I will keep answering this thread, wishing my posts will eventually surface. Richard, You are only right about a SCF calculation. This method of recomputing (ERI) integrals in each SCF step is called Direct SCF by the quantum chemistry community. However, Andrew (IIRC the orginal poster) told us he will be running multi-reference jobs. It is different business here because you will be carrying some sort of Configuration Interaction (CI) and, even though there is also a direct CI method, you do have to calculate ERI integrals, transform and store them. This transformation will fit in core only for the very small problems, and usually you already need some decent disk-IO in this step. Actually depending on the size and details of calculation, matrices become so large that you need 100s of Gb, so fast disk-IO is a must. > So if you were working on smaller systems at modest levels of theory you could put all the integrals in core and bandwidth would be very important. The smaller systems/problems that would fit in core (and finish in a matter of seconds) would probably take minutes to finish doing a direct (or semi-direct) method (recomputing), so no one needs a fancy workstation for them nowadays. > If you were working with larger systems and higher levels of theory you probably would have to resort to recomuting the integrals and therefore would be less concerned about bandwidth and more focused on clock and pure floating point. Your probably job mix and benchmarking it will be key in making the right choice. Remember that scalling with most QC methods is very steep (from O(N**3) to O(N**7))! So, depending on the size and level, even direct computations will not sufice and disk-IO will be very important as well. G -- Guilherme Menegon Arantes, PhD São Paulo, Brasil ______________________________________________________
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Advantage to compiling RHEL 5 with opteron option?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Barcelona vs. Woodcrest, computational chemistry research
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
