[Beowulf] Joe Blaylock's notes on running a MacOS cluster, Nov. 2007
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff geoff at galitz.orgThu Nov 22 02:13:00 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Joe Blaylock's notes on running a MacOS cluster, Nov. 2007
- Next message: [Beowulf] Joe Blaylock's notes on running a MacOS cluster, Nov. 2007
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I guess we are getting way off-topic, but I still have to plug-in with one more observation: I worked for SCO for 7 years prior to the Caldera buyout which resulted in "The Dark Time" and SCO's transformation into the "The SCO Group" and it's litigous ways. There were a number of vendors developing and selling UNIX in various flavors for implementation on off the shelf hardware. SCO and ISC being the two largest and more successful. As far as I can tell selling those packages for $50 was just not cost-effective. SCO UNIX cost approx $300 at that time though it could be had for steep discounts. The company was doing pretty well but found that supporting a wider array of hardware and the need for customer tech support was driving the cost up. Eventually those two functions were turned into revenue generators, meaning customers had to pay for tech support per call or buy a contract and hardware vendors could pay for preferential development support (which most of the large hardware vendors like Compaq, Dell, IBM and HP did). Those were busieness trends and not technical issues and that seems to be what kills a lot of tech busiesnesses. They do not make the transition from small development shop to mid sized tech busieness to large technology busieness well, making bad busieness decisions along the way. Charging a premium for support and development at the very time the *BSDs, Linux and the lower cost Windows NT became available was a bad idea and came about at a bad time. IOW, $50 a seat for a *NIX with commerical support and backing was not technically or economically feasible. SCO was huge in the database on i386 market at that time and also in control systems (for things like power plants) and that requires a lot of work to support on the developer side. The free OSs have matured since then now the market has changed. -geoff Am 21.11.2007, 22:45 Uhr, schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 02:48:48PM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > >> But what if they'd STARTED by selling NeXTStep as a Unix for PCs back >> before Linux was really born, for $50 a seat. OS/2 and Windows BOTH >> would have been stillborn, and Jobs would be Gates today. > > Dude, at some point your "hey, this is really off-topic, and do people > really want to hear my crazy what-if theories anyway?" should kick > in. Right? > > -- greg > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- ------------------------------- Geoff Galitz, geoff at galitz.org Blankenheim, Deutschland
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Joe Blaylock's notes on running a MacOS cluster, Nov. 2007
- Next message: [Beowulf] Joe Blaylock's notes on running a MacOS cluster, Nov. 2007
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
