Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] scaling SPECint_base2000 for harpertown

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Tom Elken tom.elken at qlogic.com
Wed Nov 21 09:01:39 PST 2007


> [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On Behalf Of andrew holway

> I recently got SPECint_base2000 figures from intel for 
> harpertown using low optimisation flags (-O2 -pthread -fPIC). 
> This benchmark is commonly used in particle physics circles 
> to provide a common base.

> I was expecting the numbers to scale pretty much exactly but 
> if you look at the link below the faster the chip the more 
> SPECint_base2000 you get per GHz.
> 
> Is this expected? These are aggregate figures for a dual 
> socket machine with 1.5GB ram per core.
> 
> http://www.moonet.co.uk/2004

>From what I can interpret, this URL shows SPECint_base2000 = 11751
for a 3.0 GHz Harpertown at -O2 optimization.

The highest result on the SPEC website for SPECint_base2000 I could find
is 3108 with full optimization (-fast +FDO, etc.).  3.0 GHz Harpertown
is almost surely faster than that "Precision Workstation 390 (Intel Core
2 Extreme processor X6800, 2.93 GHz)" that achieved the 3108, but not by
a factor greater than 3.

How did you come up with the 11751 score?

If you were running SPECint_rate_base2000 at 8 cores, at full
optimization, the score would likely be in the 200-300 range.

Cheers,
-Tom Elken


> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your 
> subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
> 




More information about the Beowulf mailing list