[Beowulf] Opteron
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caFri Nov 16 06:24:38 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opteron
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opteron
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Come on then SC07'ers. Whats the buzz with barcelona? I didn't get to go dammit, but I think Intel used Penryn reporting extremely effectively. I'm personally astonished how poorly AMD is doing in keeping up, or at least appearing to keep up. so far, it's quite sad: only very low-clock chips and no real promise of any upcoming save-the-bacon feature. AFAIKT, Intel has pretty much destroyed AMD's lead in memory performance now. unless Hf gates start turning to cheddar, or Quickpath fails utterly, I really don't see AMD surviving. any benefit from the ATI merger is more than a few years off, IMO, and quite specialized. Fusion may be a useful feature for markets where a highly integrated solution is rewarded (cheap desktops, laptops). so far, at least, it's just "chip legos", which is not what I'd call a Big Vision. Intel's reported approach of x86-ISA-based GPUs sounds MUCH more exciting, since it could be hopefully be subverted to do HPC (and without the sadistic computing model of current GP-GPU.) who knows? maybe AMD will do a quick merger with TSMC, start producing K10's next month with 8M onchip L3 using TSMC's 55nm process, run at 3.5 GHz with ddr3/1600. short of something fairly dramatic in those directions, it's hard to see reasons not to buy Intel. I'm more interested in hearing whether 10G eth made a good showing vs IB. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opteron
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opteron
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
