[Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Buccaneer for Hire. buccaneer at rocketmail.comSun Nov 11 08:16:25 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I can assure you that here in the US I have made then VERY aware of that fact. Since we have such a large cluster they really want to move us into RHEL in the worse way. We use XFS under Fedora and contrained to using RHEL, EXT3. When the client complains about performance, I just tell them to conmtact Redhat. --- Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2007, Buccaneer for Hire. wrote: > > > A stock kernel will from Redhat will not give you > the performance > > you need. > > Indeed, and the people I know at Red Hat in > Australia are well aware > of my thoughts on their restrictive choice of > filesystems.. :-) > > cheers! > Chris > -- > Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems > Manager > The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing > P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia > VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or > unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
