[Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govThu Nov 8 14:52:56 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 01:03 PM 11/8/2007, andrew holway wrote: >Im still not convinced, bang for buck your going to get more >clustering this junk than buying commodity hardware. Benchmarks at the >ready. > >Andy No question there.. However, if you want a low capital investment toy cluster to learn on, the $200 node is quite attractive. For instance, say you had a class of 10 people wanting to learn about cluster design and admin. You could go and get a big cluster and install the necessary management tools to let them share the cluster, or use an already existing cluster. OTOH, you could also buy 10 $2K clusters, and let them have at it on their very own. They'll learn all the things about cluster admining, rebuilding images, etc. For this kind of thing, raw performance isn't important, number of nodes is, because there's a qualitative difference between running a standalone machine and running a group of N>3 machines that have to talk. Somewhere around 5-10 computers, brute force techniques to install software like sneakernet start to really break down.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
