[Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduThu Nov 8 12:12:00 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Peter St. John wrote:
> Vincent,
> That's tough for me to answer, presumably the 1.5 is cheaper per hertz
> in power than a 3 GHz, but because of the other issues it may not be
> cheaper in GFLOPS per power. No hablo EE.
As I said in my longer reply, total system power costs per IP or FLOP
are probably going to be much higher for the smaller system. Desktop systems
typically draw 80-120 watts per CPU almost independent of clock speed,
varying according to load. I haven't measured the AMD-64 and don't know
what CPU is involved in the WalMart box, but I'm guestimating 100W each,
with the AMD as noted 3-4x faster, so there IS a considerable cost
differential in the power per useable instruction. Unless, of course,
I'm wrong. Kill-a-watt time. A measurement is worth a thousand
estimates.
rgb
> Peter
>
> On Nov 8, 2007 1:58 PM, Vincent Diepeveen <diep at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> For a compute cluster wouldn't it be a thought to also consider the
>> cost of 3 years of nonstop electricity for the amount of gflops it
>> delivers?
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>>
>> On Nov 8, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Peter St. John wrote:
>>
>>> Recently, probably you noticed, Walmart began selling a $200 linux PC.
>>> (Apparently the OS is just Ubuntu 7.10 with a small xindow manager
>>> instead of Gnome or KDE). Now Slashdot points to
>>> http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5305482907.html, the MB being sold
>>> separately for $60 ("development board"). It has 1.5GHz CPU,
>>> unpopulated memory (slots for 2GB), one 10/100 connection. Does this
>>> look to y'all like fair FLOPS/$ for a kitchen project? I'm thinking 6
>>> of them as compute nodes per 8 port router, with a bigger head node
>>> for fileserving. (actually I'll use a spare room but you know what I
>>> mean). An arrangement like this might be faster RAM access per core,
>>> compared to multicore, since each core has no competition for is't own
>>> memory, right?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Peter
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
>>> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
>>> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
--
Robert G. Brown
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone(cell): 1-919-280-8443
Web: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb
Lulu Bookstore: http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=877977
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
