[Beowulf] Which distro for the cluster?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgMon Jan 1 18:06:54 PST 2007
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which distro for the cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Saturday 30 December 2006 04:24, Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Geoff Jacobs wrote: > > > What I'd like to see is an interested party which would implement a > > good, long term security management program for FC(2n+b) releases. RH > > obviously won't do this. > > I thought there was such a party, but I'm too lazy to google for it. Fedora Legacy. It's pretty much dead these days. :-( http://fedoralegacy.org/ Important Notice: December 12, 2006 The current model for supporting maintenance distributions is being re-examined. In the meantime, we are unable to extend support to older Fedora Core releases as we had planned. As of now, Fedora Core 4 and earlier distributions are no longer being maintained. -- Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/ Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070102/5c891c9d/attachment.bin
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which distro for the cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
