[Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Douglas Eadline deadline at eadline.orgSun Feb 18 12:49:20 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
snip > > One failing I see of many cluster applications is that they are quite > brittle.. that is, they depend on a particular number of processors > toiling on the task, and the complement of processors not changing > during the "run". But this sort of thing makes a 100 node cluster no > different than depending on the one 100xspeed supercomputer. I had written a few columns about the "static" nature of clusters (and how I would like to program). Thought you might find it interesting: http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/158/32/ It turned into a three part series. -- Doug
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
