[Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kevin Ball kevin.ball at qlogic.comFri Feb 9 13:08:11 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
- Next message: [Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Mark, > > > On IB - nfs works only with IPoIB, whereas glusterfs does SDP (and ib-verbs, > > from the source repository) and is clearly way faster than NFS. > > "clearly"s like that make me nervous. to an IB enthusiast, SDP may be > more aesthetically pleasing, but why do you think IPoIB should be noticably > slower than SDP? lower cpu overhead, probably, but many people have no > problem running IP at wirespeed on IB/10GE-speed wires... As I understand it, one reason why SDP is faster than IPoIB is that the way IPoIB is currently spec'ed requires there be an extra copy relative to SDP. It is also specced with a smaller MTU, which makes a fair difference. I believe there is movement afoot to change the spec to allow for a larger MTU, but I'm not an IB expert and don't follow it religiously. -Kevin > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
- Next message: [Beowulf] GlusterFS 1.2-BENKI (GNU Cluster File System) - Announcement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
