[Beowulf] large array to run
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduThu Dec 13 14:56:43 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] large array to run
- Next message: [Beowulf] large array to run
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Geoff Jacobs wrote:
> Mark Hahn wrote:
>>> When I try to use the array of
>>> integer actual(9915,9915,9915)
>>
>> I don't speak fortran natively, but isn't that array
>> approximately 3.6 TB in size?
>
> Oops, forgot to put the decimal in the right place.
>
> 9915^3 * 8 bits/integer / 1024^3 bytes/GB = 907 GB.
>
> It could be done with a 64 bit kernel. Too big for PAE.
Yeah, if you had a box with several hundred memory slots....
Which I say only semi-sarcastically. They sound like they're coming,
they're coming. Who knows, maybe they're here and I'm just out of
touch.
If it is a sparse matrix, them just maybe one can do something on this
scale, but otherwise, well, it's like telling mathematica to go and
compute umpty-something factorial -- it will go out, make a herioc
effort, use all the free memory in the universe, and die valiantly
(perhaps taking down your computer with it if the kernel happens to need
some memory at a critical time when their isn't any). Large scale
computation as a DOS attack...
rgb
>
>
--
Robert G. Brown
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone(cell): 1-919-280-8443
Web: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb
Lulu Bookstore: http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=877977
- Previous message: [Beowulf] large array to run
- Next message: [Beowulf] large array to run
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
