[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eray Ozkural examachine at gmail.comWed Dec 12 02:28:25 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] large array to run
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 11, 2007 2:40 AM, Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> wrote: > Our view has always been use what you are comfortable with, and what you > need. If you need to run across a cluster, use MPI. If you need to run > across a single large memory machine, use OpenMP. > > FWIW: I would suggest learning both. With the advent of many-core > workstations, and accelerator systems with many many cores, programming > these things is more likely to be mediated by a compiler (OpenMP like) > than putting MPI stacks on the Cell SPUs (not enough local scratchpad > ram for it). > > Just my $0.02, and I hope I generated light, and very little heat. Thanks for your comments. I've seen that OpenMP is much easier to develop with than MPI, which in my experience takes a lot of time to program with due to its low-level nature and complicated side-effects. I would in fact prefer to use implicit parallelism in a high-level language (functional) to program complicated memory architectures. Which doesn't exist in the way I imagine it due to the short-sightedness of programming language people. I don't think that the programmer should be too involved with the exact details of caches, etc. It doesn't make too much sense to me. Back in the day, I learned how to write assembly code that fits in some 256 byte code cache. But how do you do that kind of optimization in a large scale NUMA architecture, what if you move the code to a slightly different architecture? The OpenMP model is superior to old ways of programming shared memory systems (like the awful pthreads), but as the architectures get more complicated I doubt that it will allow the programmers to extract sufficient performance from those systems. BTW, is OpenMP usable with the Cell processor on the Playstation 3? I wondered. Best, -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunct: http://myspace.com/malfunct ai-philosophy: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
- Previous message: [Beowulf] large array to run
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
