Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] a "microwulf" posted

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.com
Fri Aug 31 12:27:41 PDT 2007


Kilian,
I'm a noobie at the hardware issues but your machine at Sanford sounds like
great bang/buck. Plainly economies of scale work both ways (I can't imagine
wiring up that many nodes with ethernet). The factor of five thing sounds
like a careless gloss of some numbers from some edition of the top500 lists,
from some date, by INQ. Adams' site seems more modest. What I love about it
is that it completely specs out what he did, very clearly. He gets an A for
documentation, I'm not such a n00b at documentation :-)
Peter


On 8/31/07, Kilian CAVALOTTI <kilian at stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> On Friday 31 August 2007 09:37:49 am Peter St. John wrote:
> > I saw at wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beowulf_%28computing%29
> > that someone posted a link to
> > http://www.calvin.edu/~adams/research/microwulf/, a nice description
> > of a "microwulf" at Calvin College. It has brief but useful
> > descriptions of it's design, cost broken down by parts in the
> > Manifest, and price/performance specs.
> > If LLNL is an Epic maybe this is only a limmerick, but it's a witty
> > limmerick.
>
> It's also been posted on the INQ:
> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42050
>
> It's very interesting from the design point of view, but I'm less
> convinced by the price tag argument.
>
> Stanford University recently purchased a 276 dual-socket quad-core HPC
> cluster, which is capable of 20.6TFlops (peak) and actually achieved
> 15.5TFlops (it has been ranked #54 in the latest Top500 list).
>
> The cost per GFlops has been $109, which is indeed more expensive than
> the microwulf's $94/GFlops, but still far from being "five times as
> much", as claimed by the INQ article. Besides, the price included
> software (a commercial scheduler) and support, management capabilities,
> 50TB high-performance storage, an administration GigE network and a DDR
> Infiniband interconnect.
>
> I guess it's easier to lower the cost per GFlop on large scale clusters,
> but I'd just wanted to put this into perspective, and show that you
> don't necessarily need to build your cluster from scratch to get
> comparable price/performance ratios.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Kilian
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070831/da48ad2e/attachment.html


More information about the Beowulf mailing list