[Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Glen Dosey doseyg at r-networks.netThu Aug 23 12:15:45 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I am using the async flag. I'm also using the Infiniband now instead of the GigE and I've increased my default TCP window up to 6MB. None of it makes a difference. It's still around 40MB/s. Thanks for the thought. On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 15:11 -0400, Jeff Blasius wrote: > Yes. > > Just a shot in the dark, but are you using the async flag in your nfs > export options? Can you bond your ethernet ports for a quick win? > > Thanks, > jeff > > On 8/23/07, Glen Dosey <doseyg at r-networks.net> wrote: > > Perhaps I should just ask the simple question. Does anyone on-list > > obtain greater than 40 MB/s performance from their networked filesystems > > ( when the file is not already cached in the servers memory ) ? > > > > (Yes it's a loaded question because if you answer affirmatively, then I > > know who to interrogate with further questions :) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > > >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
