[Beowulf] scheduler policy design
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
laytonjb at charter.net laytonjb at charter.netTue Apr 24 12:01:08 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Why is communication so expensive for very small messages?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Why is communication so expensive for very small messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I haven't heard this about VMWare. I've heard that VirtualIron has some drivers for IB that give the VM the same performance as the native layer (no evidence of that though). I think Don Becker has some experience here. I know he's hesitant to post, but I think it would be good to hear from the master :) Jeff > Joe Landman wrote: > > [...] > > > Current virtualization requires running in a VMware or similar type > > window. This is heavyweight and slow, and it impedes access to fast low > > latency resources. > > I stand corrected, VMWare can be fast. From data provided offline, > cannot share. Still wondering about the performance cost to use IB and > other fast networks. Maybe some experimentation is in order ... > > > > -- > > Joseph Landman, Ph.D > Founder and CEO > Scalable Informatics LLC, > email: landman at scalableinformatics.com > web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com > phone: +1 734 786 8423 > fax : +1 734 786 8452 or +1 866 888 3112 > cell : +1 734 612 4615 > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Why is communication so expensive for very small messages?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Why is communication so expensive for very small messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
