[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jakob Oestergaard jakob at unthought.netThu Apr 12 00:37:51 PDT 2007
- Previous message: Why is 64 bit faster. RE: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:30:41PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: > Jon Forrest wrote: > > >One thing I've noticed about 64-bit computing in general > >is that it's being oversold. The **only** reason > >for running in 64-bit mode is if you need the additional > >address space. For AMD64 (including EM64T) you get more registers when putting the CPU in 64-bit mode. A *lot* more registers. That really matters on an architecture where you historically had clost to zero general purpose registers. This is unlike UltraSPARC, where your point is pretty much correct. -- / jakob
- Previous message: Why is 64 bit faster. RE: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
