[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Apr 11 13:18:18 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> performance boost when going to 64 bit in most situations. Core 2 chips > suffer a small penalty when going 64 bit. I suspect this is due to the Core2 has some micro-optimizations which are only enabled for 32b mode, which is an interesting choice. AMD tends to be biased towards HPC or at least serverish stuff, which is 64b-oriented... > cache hit rate suffering which, with a traditional north bridge, would > have proportionally more effect. I can't think of negative effects of x86_64 other than possible higher memory overhead for apps that use lots of pointers. compilers are a typical example, but perhaps some sparse matrix stuff, too? code density in x86_64 mode is not much different in mcmodel=small (for instance, it's not the case that every offset in branch and memory reference instructions become giant...) it'll be most interesting to see how AMD has optimized Barcelona...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
