[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Forrest jlforrest at berkeley.eduSun Apr 8 17:41:28 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Toon Moene wrote: > I wouldn't be to sure of that. Recently I became interested in the > divisors of a given natural number. I suspect small programs can be written to show almost any kind of interesting behavior. [program snipped] > The execution time difference was about 2 orders of magnitude. My guess is that this is a perfect x86-64 program. Everything fits in the cache, and there are enough registers so that all the variables fit in registers. The experiment I tried was to build several fairly large programs on Fedora Core 6 32 bit and then 64 bit using exactly the same hardware. This is clearly not the same kind of test as your example but it's more relevant as a systems-level comparison. If I remember, I built mysql and apache. This took about the same amount of time in both modes. I suspect that the Beowulf crowd would have lots of experience with 32-bits vs 64-bits question, so I'd welcome additional comments, especially dealing with situations where programs *don't* need the additional address space of the 64-bit model. Cordially, -- Jon Forrest Unix Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest at berkeley.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
