[Beowulf] commercial clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.comThu Sep 28 16:23:37 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] commercial clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] commercial clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I've spoken quite extensively to several organisations here in Western Australia who each have 1000+cpu systems in Perth, 2000+cpu systems in London and 4000+ systems in Houston (oil and gas seismic processing). They tell me that they have tried to sell just the cycle time to no success. The value is in the specialised services they offer (in these cases seismic processing), which just happen to use a lot of cpu's. These companies even go as far to roll their own cluster file systems (using FUSE+nfs) and writing their own queuing/scheduling environment etc. The higher level services certainly pay well :) Stu. On 27/09/2006, at 3:10, Angel Dimitrov wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some experience of running of numerical weather models on > clusters. > > Is there many clients for processor time? As I saw the biggest > supercomputers in the World are very busy! I'm wondering if it's > worthwhile to setup a commercial cluster. Intel are planning for new > processors - two CPUs each with quad cores. Two such machines will > have power like one 50 GHz CPU:-) > > Any ideas and comments are welcome! > > Angel -- Dr Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] commercial clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] commercial clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
