[Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.comFri Sep 8 17:58:59 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > It does apply, however, many parallel algorithms used today are > naturally blocking. Why? Well, complicating your algorithm to overlap > communication and computation rarely gives a benefit in practice. So > anyone who's tried has likely become discouraged, and most people > haven't even tried. > > -- greg You comment about overlapping computation and communication is interesting. As the number of cores per address space goes up, the chance that overlapping computation with communication actually gives you anything also decreases... memory copies require CPU intervention (unless you offload it to your NIC which then means you suffer the normal latencies/message rates etc there). Sure, you can offload the copy to the NIC on some interconnects (eg. Quadrics) but I personally found that the increased latency and decreased bandwidth of the copy affected performance more than not overlapping. -- Dr Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] cluster softwares supporting parallel CFD computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
