[Beowulf] Most stable kernel for mpich2 cluster?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Buccaneer for Hire. buccaneer at rocketmail.comSun Oct 22 05:31:06 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Most stable kernel for mpich2 cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Sun Project "blackbox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Although we roll our own, I would recommend you run a standard kernel unless there is a compelling reason not to. Doing your own kernel takes time and a lot of testing. ----- Original Message ---- From: Peter Kjellstrom <cap at nsc.liu.se> To: beowulf at beowulf.org Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 4:41:02 AM Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Most stable kernel for mpich2 cluster? On Friday 20 October 2006 16:55, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: > Hi, > > I build a cluster for Technological Institute of Athens, here, in Greece, > with linux of course. My hardware is sixteen HP DL380 with 3.00GHz Xeon(do > not laugh, I know that my cluster is too small for those, some of you, > design and maintain). I want to install the pure vanilla-sources but I have > problem to decide the best version. 2.6.18.1 is out but I think that it' s > not a good idea to install the latest kernel, so, I would like to tell me > your opinion. > What would you do? I would use the kernel already shipped by your linux distribution of choice. This would have several advantages including getting security updates without having to keep track of the details yourself. /Peter
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Most stable kernel for mpich2 cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Sun Project "blackbox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
