Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Has anyone actually seen/used a cell system?

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Andrew Shewmaker agshew at gmail.com
Mon Oct 2 11:38:18 PDT 2006


On 10/2/06, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com> wrote:

> I agree that generally libraries are a much more practical thing to implement.
>
> I don't know which category sequoia falls into I haven't read the paper,
> the only way it sounds interesting to this conversation is that it has
> some mildly interesting benchmark numbers associated with it.
>
> At the moment I'm a lot more interested in packets per second and bandwidth
> per second for future architectures then flops per seconds.  Cpu architects
> understand how to push the flops per second of general purpose processors
> quite high and are unlikely to develop amnesia when they have competition
> who is just as able as they are.   Where the current challenge comes from
> is how do you keep the bandwidth and I/O rates to the outside world growing
> at an exponential rate.  Maybe big SMPs on a chip will help with this if they can
> isolate most of the traffic inside them selves but I doubt it.

See Table 3 and Figure 11 on pages 9 and 10, respectively.  Table 3 reports
bandwidth for memory bound benchmarks, and Figure 11 graphs time waiting
on memory, overhead (barrier sync + runtime logic), and leaf task execution
time.

For memory bound SAXPY and SGEMV they report 18-22.1 GB/s out of a
theoretical 25.6 GB/s for the XDR memory.

They don't list the bandwidth numbers for the cluster, though they do show
the performance delta between pre-distributed and without pre-distibution.

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Shewmaker



More information about the Beowulf mailing list