Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Thought that this might be of interest

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.com
Mon Nov 6 08:04:00 PST 2006


Richard Walsh wrote:
> Joe Landman wrote:
>> We are working on a machine with 2 Opteron 2218s.  For laughs, I ran 
>> streams on it.  Here are 1,2,3,4 processor data.
>>
>> 1 processor:
>>
>> Copy:       5713.9944      0.0591      0.0560      0.0600
>> Scale:      5713.9822      0.0587      0.0560      0.0600
>> Add:        5454.2389      0.0911      0.0880      0.0920
>> Triad:      5454.1576      0.0916      0.0880      0.0920
>>
>     Mmmm ... these actually seem low considering the bus bandwidth is 
> supposed to be 10.67 GB/sec

Heh.... don't shoot the measurer ... :)

I agree BTW that I expected this to be about 7++ GB/s per socket.  This 
is a pathscale built binary.  Will try with PGI and Intel as well.

>     in the socket F.  Using the 75% rule (1 silent read, 2 actual reads, 
> and 1 write) from the triad shouldn't
>     we get:
> 
>     10.67 * .75 =  ~8 GBs/sec

Possibly...  The bandwidth per socket is 10.67 GB/s.  So the two thread 
on one socket should be pretty darned close to that.  I am surprised 
that it wasn't.

  Moreover, other folks seem to note what we observed: 
http://tweakers.net/reviews/646/5 with about 5.3 GB/s BW/core.  I think 
affinity is keeping two threads on the same core, so it might take a 
little bit of work to get a real 1 thread/socket number.

[...]

>> 4 processors:
>> Copy:      13332.7765      0.0302      0.0240      0.0360
>> Scale:     13332.7765      0.0262      0.0240      0.0320
>> Add:       13332.6220      0.0400      0.0360      0.0480
>> Triad:     14999.0756      0.0391      0.0320      0.0480
>     These are the numbers I would expect here  ... about 70% of  2 * 
> 10.67 GBs/sec.
>     I think that your out-"liar" is actually giving you the correct 
> numbers.

Possible.  I was expecting something north of 12 GB/s.




-- 

Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423
fax  : +1 734 786 8452 or +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615




More information about the Beowulf mailing list