[Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seFri Mar 24 06:41:57 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Andrew D. Fant" <fant at pobox.com> writes: > John Hearns wrote: > >> Eh? Install the libraries in /usr/local/xxxxx on the head node. >> Export this as an NFS share. Mount on all nodes, and put it into your >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH. >> IMHO, there is very little reason for installing APPLICATION level >> libraries on individual nodes. > > uhm, aside from NFS being SLOW and not scaling well? I really don't think the loading of dynamic libraries is performance sensitive. The (non-dedicated) machine that serves /usr/local with all our compiler and math libs to our 200 node cluster is idling along. -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
