[Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comThu Mar 23 13:17:58 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:51:38PM -0300, Ivan Silvestre Paganini Marin wrote: > I am curious to see if a static compilated program is fastest than a > dynamic one. It depends. If you call enough really short functions in a library, you'll see a difference. This is fairly rare. The bigger effect is that the shared library has to be -fpic (position independent code). On x86_64, our compiler is pretty good at keeping this overhead low, but your mileage will vary. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Next message: [Beowulf] Static Compilation versus Dynamic Compilation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
