[Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL:G: parallel G03 in Linux cluster]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSat Mar 18 09:22:34 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL:G: parallel G03 in Linux cluster]
- Next message: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL:G: parallel G03 in Linux cluster]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> >> The OpenMP parallelization should also work without Linda - but of course > >> limited to some routines and 2 cores. I wonder if this is only true if you, for instance, compile gaussian with a PGI demo license or something. also, the normal (old) way of using SMP is fork-based parallelism with SYSV shm. is this separate (orthogonal) to OpenMP-based parallelism? I suspect the latter is only used for SMP parallelism within parallelized blas libraries like MKL. > machines with single dual-core CPUs. Let's rephrase: ...but limited to the > cores in each of the machines. mosix, I believe, provides network-shared SYSV shm. I wonder if anyone has tried to use gaussian that way. depending on the sharing patters, it might work pretty well - my understanding is that the shm is used mainly for caching intermediate values (integrals?), which might be write-once-read-mostly, and therefore friendly to the kind of caching necessary for any page-based net-shm implementation. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL:G: parallel G03 in Linux cluster]
- Next message: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL:G: parallel G03 in Linux cluster]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
