[Beowulf] Vector coprocessors
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Mar 16 09:54:39 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Vector coprocessors
- Next message: [Beowulf] Vector coprocessors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pfenniger wrote: >> You need "really big" volumes to get there. > > > Yes, but it does not seem to me unreasonable to put such a card in > millions of PC's if the average applications run a bit faster and the > cost increase stays below the PC cost. After all > the 8087 math coprocessor of the i386 era did just that. I agree that it makes sense to put such a card into millions of PCs. Not at $8000/card. The issue is that the C600 costs quite a bit itself as it is not being produced in volumes that can drive enough economies of scale (yet). So the basic part will be a few k$. The card cost will be (relatively speaking) low. I think (WAG here) that Clearspeed wants people to design a socket onto motherboards for them. Lowers the costs all around. >> I would say that there is more potential for a clever soul to >> reprogram the guts of Matlab, etc., to transparently share the work >> across multiple machines. I think that's in the back of the mind of >> MS, as they move toward a services environment and .NET > > > Lots of people have thought about that for a long time, including > Cleve Moeller. The potential clever soul should be well above > average, and considering MS products, well above MS average programmer. > > An intriguing way to parallelize C with threads on multicore processors is > provided by Cilk (http://supertech.lcs.mit.edu/cilk/). Cilk consists of > a couple of simple extensions to the C language. > > If anyone has experience with Cilk it would be nice to share. The only problem with extensions to any language is that you get a hideously low adoption rate. You could use UPC. Or Cilk, or ... (insert your favorite extension here). Only a small (miniscule) fraction of people will use it, regardless of its technical merits. > > Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Vector coprocessors
- Next message: [Beowulf] Vector coprocessors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
