[Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comSat Jun 17 08:57:03 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >> GigE is not perfect. My point is that for many applications >> it can work well. > > for many apps of certain job sizes... > >> desktop (32 bit PCI) cards. I managed to get 14.6 HPL GFLOPS >> and 4.35 GROMACS GFLOPS out of 8 nodes consisting of hardware > ... >> As a point of reference, a quad opteron 270 (2GHz) reported >> 4.31 GROMACS GFLOPS. > > that's perplexing to me, since the first cluster has semp/2500's, > right? that's a 1.75 GHz K8 core with 128K L2 and 64b memory > interface. versus the same number of 2.0 GHz, 1M cores each with > 4x 128b memory. I really wouldn't expect them to be that close - > any speculation on why GROMACS runs so poorly on the much better > SMP machine? <googling for motherboard specs> Aha, Socket 462. The Semprons he used are K7 based. -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs Go to the Chinese Restaurant, Order the Special
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
