[Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Douglas Eadline deadline at clustermonkey.netSat Jun 17 05:25:05 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Several persons replied and not a SINGLE ONE of them talks about > one way pingpong latency, which is one of the most important features > of a highend network for *many* applications. Sigh, as I mentioned in my past post, go to the link below Understand that it requires reading skills. http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/121/33/1/1/ Look at Table One and the two graphs, there are numbers there. Read the numbers. They are MPI single byte latency for NetPipe. GigE is not perfect. My point is that for many applications it can work well. There are many other applications that need better networking. It is a price to performance argument. BTW, the NICs I used in the link above were $35 Intel MT/1000 desktop (32 bit PCI) cards. I managed to get 14.6 HPL GFLOPS and 4.35 GROMACS GFLOPS out of 8 nodes consisting of hardware with a total costs of $2500. (much less using today prices) Background is at the following link: http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/41/33/ As a point of reference, a quad opteron 270 (2GHz) reported 4.31 GROMACS GFLOPS. -- Doug
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
