[Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comFri Jun 16 19:14:50 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
laytonjb at charter.net wrote: <snip> > Sure. This is for one specific CFD code. Let's assum that MPICH 1 is the basline. > MPICH2 was twice as fast (half the run time). LAM was 30% faster than MPICH2. > Scali MPI Connect was 20% faster than LAM. Altogether, Scali MPI Connect > was twice as fast as MPICH1. > > Is this what you were looking for? > > Jeff > Yes, thanks. How well did LAM scale beyond 2^4 nodes compared to the others? -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs Go to the Chinese Restaurant, Order the Special
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list