[Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comSun Jan 29 21:13:59 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:36:03PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > I tend to think of IB as mainly for high-bandwidth, since afaikt its > latency isn't even as good as myri 2g (mx, 3 us). to say nothing of > myri 10g, quadrics, numalink, sci. I know some people don't think of InfiniPath as being InfiniBand, but really, Mark, I didn't think you were one of them! ;-) In any case, yes, you are correct for Mellanox InfiniBand HCAs, but not for InfiniPath. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list