[Beowulf] Re: about clusters in high schools
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comSun Jan 29 19:28:03 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: about clusters in high schools
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: about clusters in high schools
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 04:04:48PM -0800, Jim Lux wrote: > At 01:31 PM 1/29/2006, James Cownie wrote: > >A whole class may be more than is necessary, but the inability of > >the Morton Thiokol engineers to produce a convincing presentation > >of their results which made No. As Tufte pointed out, those engineers produced poorly analyzed chart-junk filled graphs which obscured rather than helped reveal the meaning in the data. They could have instead easily produced an informative graph which would have helped illuminate the known and very severe risk of O-ring burn through. They did not, and indeed, the graphs they DID generate were WORSE than useless. That was an ENGINEERING failure, and not one that would have been helped by any class on what is colloquially known as "presentation skills". A serious, hard-core treatment of graph and information design, yes, that could have helped. "Presentation skills", no. > Actually, the problem in NASA is that too much reliance is made on > "presentations" which are fundamentally "selling tools", and not enough on > writing engineering reports. See Edward Tufte's comments on PowerPoint for Exactly. -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: about clusters in high schools
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: about clusters in high schools
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
