[Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seWed Jan 18 04:50:39 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"C. Ahmet MERCAN" <ahmet.mercan at gmail.com> writes: > No, because an one-byte-size file wastes a block of harddisk. That's file system dependent. Solaris UFS can subdivide blocks into fragments. A file can use as little as an eighth of a block. I guess one of Joe's points is that, yes, you can have zillions of little files in a flat directory without too much pain. Just use the correct operating system and file system. I agree, but it's still a nasty habit. You might be fine right now, but you never know when you'll end up in a *new* situation where you suddenly get a per-file overhead. -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] since we are talking about file systems ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
