[Beowulf] [kathleen@massivelyparallel.com: RE: [Bioclusters] FPGAin bioinformatics clusters (again?)]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comMon Jan 16 18:39:20 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: [Bioclusters] FPGAin bioinformatics clusters (again?)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Beowulf cluster configuration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:19:48AM -0800, Michael Will wrote: > I have always been amazed at the promises of massivelyparallel. Now > their technique is so good they don't even need the source code to > parallelize? I liked the part where they generalized from BLAST scalability (hint: it's embarrassingly parallel, if you can deal with distributing the databases) to scalability of codes like Amber (molecular dynamics, not at all embarrassingly parallel.) That makes me want to run out and buy their technology. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: [Bioclusters] FPGAin bioinformatics clusters (again?)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Beowulf cluster configuration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list