[Beowulf] Naming Convention Survey
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.comMon Jan 9 18:50:59 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Naming Convention Survey
- Next message: [Beowulf] Naming Convention Survey
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
1) /home Globally available, backed up, quotas imposed, moderate bandwidth (~400MB/s) and good meta data performance, accounted for based on user 2) /short Globally available, not backed up, soft quotas allow us to disable access to the queue - no hard quotas, high bandwidth (>2GB/s), short lived files (if a file isn't access for 3 weeks, we delete it), accounted for based on project 3) /jobfs Locally attached, managed (user allocated space created at the start of their job and cleaned up at the end of their job), not backed up, moderate-high bandwidth (400MB/s-800MB/s) but extremely high meta data performance, accounted for based on job On 10/01/2006, at 3:28, Brian D. Ropers-Huilman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > Simple question, likely a complicated answer. Cluster systems > should have up > to three distinct file systems: > > 1) a place to compile and keep "stuff" > 2) a bit of disk to use while code is running > 3) potential a bit of disk with special characteristics, likely > high-performance > > Typically #1 would be called /home. Here at LSU, #2 is typically > called > /var/scratch or /var/local/scratch. Then there is #3. Sometimes we > call this > /scratch and sometimes /work. > > My question: what do other folks call these bits of disk? -- Dr Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Naming Convention Survey
- Next message: [Beowulf] Naming Convention Survey
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
