[Beowulf] "dual" Quad solution from Tyan
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Karsten Petersen karsten.petersen at megware.comTue Feb 28 01:46:19 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] "dual" Quad solution from Tyan
- Next message: [Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, just some remarks (I have a VX50 with 8x Opteron 880 in the other room...): Mark Hahn schrieb: >> http://www.cybernex.co.uk/tyan_vx50_quad_opteron_servers.htm > afaikt, this is a ladder design: > > c-c-c-c > | | | | > c-c-c-c Not quite, this would make no use of two HT channels. Its like this: c--c--c--c | | \/| | | /\| c--c--c--c (The two leftmost CPUs need their third HT to connect the two chipsets.) > who says it's so great? the HT fabric is pretty far from a "perfect" > low-latency 16-port crossbar, for instance. also, is it really cheaper? > how about if you compare to four 2-socket DC nodes? Well, from my experiences with the first sold VX50 systems: If you have a well scaling MPI application you are probably better off in price/performance with a bunch of Opteron 180, 252 or 280 based machines and Infiniband. (Or Intel Bensley...) I consider these VX50 beasts more interesting for pre/postprocessing and not too large shmem/omp applications. Such a machine is the answer to "16 threads - do I really need an Altix?" Best wishes, Karsten -- HPC System Engineer Tel.: +49 3722 528 43 Fax: +49 3722 528 15 E-Mail: karsten.petersen at megware.com MEGWARE Computer GmbH Vertrieb und Service Nordstraße 19 09247 Chemnitz/Röhrsdorf Germany http://www.megware.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] "dual" Quad solution from Tyan
- Next message: [Beowulf] 'dual' Quad solution from Tyan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
