Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] "dual" Quad solution from Tyan

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca
Mon Feb 27 17:53:44 PST 2006


>   I'm responsible for the aquisition of my labs new cluster. I already had 

what's the purpose of the cluster?  without a well-defined purpose,
there's no way to evaluate the options...

> here, in Portugal. The target machine I was looking for was 8 node with 
> dual processor Opteron (16 CPU). The machine that was at the presentation 

OK, so 8 dual-socket nodes will deliver an aggregate memory bandwidth
of 16*6.4 GB/s, and a capacity of 64 dimms.

> http://www.cybernex.co.uk/tyan_vx50_quad_opteron_servers.htm

afaikt, this is a ladder design: 

c-c-c-c
| | | |
c-c-c-c

which is 5 hops corner-to-corner, with a bisection of 3.2 GB/s per node.
half the aggregate memory bandwidth and capacity.

> which means 8 CPU, dual core. And all are connect with hypertransport 
> which meand I got ready of latency I figure. So...

well, HT latency is better than gigabit, if that's what you mean.
I've never read a good evaluation of MPI implementations on this kind 
of hardware.

don't forget that dual-core is lower clocked.

> The professor head of the lab wants me to know "if that is so good why 
> isn't everyone buying one?"

who says it's so great?  the HT fabric is pretty far from a "perfect"
low-latency 16-port crossbar, for instance.  also, is it really cheaper?
how about if you compare to four 2-socket DC nodes?




More information about the Beowulf mailing list