[Beowulf] g77 limits...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Feb 23 12:20:11 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Next message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: > No arguments, except that REAL science and engineering is not by > hypothesis flat, rectangular, or (only) complex. Fortran does decent > formula translation type programming, but it is not terrible flexible or > powerful otherwise. It has obvious weaknesses -- things that are just > plain painful to do -- for all that it does what it does and was > "meant" to do quite well. It wasn't designed to write editors or > operating systems in, or to work well with symbols in general or memory > in general. I thought you said you worked on a Vax. The negative indexing tricks were fun. Don't remember any of them. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Next message: [Beowulf] g77 limits...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
